Table of Contents
Nikolai Gogol and the “Little Men” in Russian Literature
Nikolai Gogol (1809–1852) stands as one of the most pivotal figures in Russian literature, bridging the gap between Romanticism and Realism. His works are renowned for their biting satire, grotesque humor, and profound exploration of human suffering. Among his most enduring contributions is the literary archetype of the “little man” (маленький человек)—a humble, often downtrodden individual crushed by the weight of an oppressive social and bureaucratic system.
Gogol’s portrayal of these characters was revolutionary, influencing generations of Russian writers, including Fyodor Dostoevsky, Anton Chekhov, and Mikhail Saltykov-Shchedrin. This essay examines Gogol’s depiction of the “little man,” analyzing key characters such as Akaky Akakievich Bashmachkin (The Overcoat), Poprishchin (Diary of a Madman), and others, while also exploring the socio-political context of 19th-century Russia that shaped these narratives. Finally, it will assess Gogol’s legacy and the lasting impact of his “little men” on world literature.
The Concept of the “Little Man” in Russian Literature
Definition and Origins
The “little man” is a literary trope that emerged in early 19th-century Russia, reflecting the struggles of the lower bureaucratic class and impoverished urban dwellers. Unlike the heroic or aristocratic protagonists of Romanticism, the “little man” is insignificant in society—a petty clerk, a low-ranking official, or a poor artisan whose life is dictated by the whims of those in power.
The concept was not entirely Gogol’s invention; Alexander Pushkin’s The Stationmaster (1830) introduced a sympathetic portrayal of a minor official. However, Gogol refined the archetype, blending pathos with satire, making his “little men” both tragic and absurd.
Social and Historical Context
Gogol wrote during the reign of Nicholas I (1825–1855), a period marked by strict censorship, a rigid class system, and an expanding but inefficient bureaucracy. The Table of Ranks (1722) had formalized social hierarchy, leaving minor clerks like Akaky Akakievich trapped in meaningless labor with no hope of advancement.
Gogol’s works expose the dehumanizing effects of this system—how a man could spend his entire life copying documents, only to be discarded when no longer useful. His “little men” are victims not just of poverty but of spiritual emptiness, a theme that would later dominate Dostoevsky’s works.
Gogol’s “Little Men”: Key Characters and Analysis
1. Akaky Akakievich Bashmachkin (The Overcoat, 1842)
The Tragicomic Hero
Akaky Akakievich, the protagonist of The Overcoat, is the quintessential “little man.” A lowly copying clerk, he performs his duties with robotic precision, enduring mockery from his colleagues. His name—repetitive and absurd—reflects his lack of individuality in a system that reduces men to cogs in a machine.
The Overcoat as a Symbol
Akaky’s life gains meaning only when he saves up for a new overcoat, which he sees as a source of dignity. The coat becomes a metaphor for social belonging—once he wears it, he is briefly accepted by his peers. However, when it is stolen, the authorities ignore his pleas, exposing the cruelty of a system that values rank over humanity.
Death and Rebellion
Akaky’s death from grief is both heartbreaking and darkly humorous (his ghost famously steals coats in revenge). This ending suggests that even in death, the “little man” cannot escape his insignificance—unless he resorts to the supernatural.
2. Poprishchin (Diary of a Madman, 1835)
Descent into Madness
Poprishchin, another low-ranking clerk, is even more psychologically complex than Akaky. His diary entries chronicle his growing paranoia and eventual madness, culminating in the delusion that he is the King of Spain.
Social Insignificance and Delusions of Grandeur
His madness stems from social humiliation—he is infatuated with his director’s daughter but is deemed unworthy. His fantasies of power are a tragic inversion of his real powerlessness, highlighting how the “little man” copes with oppression through escapism.
Gogol’s Use of Unreliable Narration
Unlike The Overcoat, which uses third-person irony, Diary of a Madman employs a first-person perspective, making Poprishchin’s suffering more intimate and disturbing. This technique influenced later psychological realism, particularly Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground.
3. Kovalyov (The Nose, 1836)
Absurdity and Identity Crisis
Though not a traditional “little man,” Major Kovalyov experiences a grotesque loss of identity when his nose vanishes and attains a higher rank than him. The story satirizes social climbing and the fragility of status—even a minor official like Kovalyov fears losing his place in the hierarchy.
4. Ivan Ivanovich and Ivan Nikiforovich (The Tale of How the Two Ivans Quarreled, 1835)
Petty Bureaucrats and the Absurdity of Conflict
This comic tale depicts two friends whose ridiculous feud over a trivial insult destroys their lives. Though not “little men” in the same sense as Akaky, they embody the pettiness and vanity of provincial officials, reinforcing Gogol’s critique of a society obsessed with rank and appearances.
Gogol’s Literary Techniques in Portraying the “Little Man”
1. Satire and Grotesque Humor
Gogol’s genius lies in his ability to blend tragedy with absurdity. Akaky’s obsession with his overcoat is funny, yet his suffering is real. This duality forces readers to laugh and then question their laughter, creating a deeper emotional impact.
2. Psychological Depth
Unlike earlier satirists, Gogol delves into his characters’ inner lives. Poprishchin’s madness is not just a joke—it is a desperate response to oppression, foreshadowing Dostoevsky’s explorations of mental anguish.
3. Symbolism
- The Overcoat = dignity, social acceptance
- The Nose = identity and rank
- Madness = escape from an unbearable reality
4. Social Critique
Gogol’s works expose:
- The hypocrisy of bureaucracy (officials who ignore Akaky)
- The emptiness of social status (Kovalyov’s panic over his nose)
- The dehumanization of the lower classes
Gogol’s Influence on Later Literature
1. Dostoevsky: “We All Came Out from Under Gogol’s Overcoat”
Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk (1846) features Makar Devushkin, a direct descendant of Akaky—a poor clerk whose letters reveal his suffering. However, Dostoevsky adds spiritual depth, making his “little men” more introspective.
2. Chekhov’s Tragicomic Clerks
Chekhov’s short stories (The Death of a Clerk, The Man in a Case) continue Gogol’s tradition, depicting minor officials trapped in meaningless routines.
3. Kafka’s Absurd Bureaucracies
Gogol’s influence extends beyond Russia—Franz Kafka’s The Trial and The Castle echo Gogol’s themes of helplessness against faceless systems.
Conclusion: Gogol’s Enduring Legacy
Gogol’s “little men” are more than literary devices—they are universal symbols of human vulnerability. Through satire, tragedy, and psychological insight, Gogol exposed the absurdity and cruelty of social hierarchies, leaving a legacy that shaped Russian Realism, Existentialism, and Modernist literature.
His characters—whether Akaky dying for an overcoat, Poprishchin dreaming of royalty, or Kovalyov chasing his nose—remain hauntingly relevant, reminding us of the cost of indifference in any society. As Dostoevsky recognized, modern literature owes much to Gogol’s “little men,” whose struggles continue to resonate across time and cultures.
No responses yet